Here is a little taste of the "favorites of" everything in several categories across entertainment. Not everything on this list necessarily came out in 2011--but 2011 is the first time I heard/read/saw the entertainment.
Be forewarned I am SO far behind on my TV shows, lol, so don't expect to see current favorites listed or current seasons.
[It's National Book Week. The rules: grab the closest book to you, go to page 56, & copy the 5th sentence as your status. Don't cite the book; post these rules.]
"If God was prepared to let us off, why on earth did He not do so?"
A friend of mine remarked, "Borders' sales model was a dinosaur, it is now extinct. Evolve or die." I worked there a couple of years and saw this firsthand; my friend sums up pretty well what killed them in a nutshell. I don't know if they simply didn't have the funds to evolve or had the funds and put them into the wrong initiatives. I have no idea why they tried to compete with Kindle and Nook. The maddening thing there is that Amazon used to be supplier of Borders e-store before they got their own. Clearly there was a mutual relationship there. Why didn't they work something out to carry and promote the Kindle?
The book-lover in me laments the demise of the Borders. Where I live in central Maine, Borders was right here in town. The next closest chain bookstore is a B&N over an hour away; I doubt I will ever visit it because I don't buy books in-store that much anymore. But I still loved to go into a bookstore and just absorb the atmosphere (see the film Inkheart for a better understanding of what I mean).
But the publisher in me won't be that sad to see the chain go away. See, another thing I learned first-hand as an employee is that chain bookstores are little more than a glorified ad agency for the biggest of the publishers. Did you ever wonder why you could walk into any store of a particular chain and see certain books and displays are nearly identical as another within that chain? Publishers buy that space, like exhibitors at a convention or advertisers in a Super Bowl. And it's priced so that the the chance of a small press getting a shot at that coveted space is a near impossibility.
This is not how the book marketplace is supposed to work. Content... Story is what people buy a book for, not the imprint. Big Publishers are hardly consistent in churning out continuous qulaity material with every release. An author might, but there is ample room for established authors and new finds at a bookstore front if a chain bookstore wanted. Simply use a 'established author/local author' model and I think you'd find that to be accepted as a fair set-up by most parties. Obviouslly the big corps would object, but then competition is what they're afraid of.
Competition: that's how the free market is supposed to work and that's all I am advocating.
And by the way, if you think ebooks are what killed Borders then you need to plug yourself right now into Kristine Katherine Rusch's vital series on publishing. You can start here (where she wrote about Borders impending demise back in January) and then go here for an overview of the role of Bookstores in the book market--in both places (and in several others in that series) she talks about how ebooks fit into the landscape of publishing; after you're done with those two articles, be sure to finish up with her post here about how ebooks will likely help sell more in-print books, not less...
LFL is looking to hire a new 'Senior Editor' to develop its book and comic book products going forward.
For this long-time fan of Star Wars--and its books and comic books through the NJO/Ep3 years--as well as afficianado of good literature and storytelling, what a bittersweet thing to learn. I do not have a college degree, nor will I ever seek one (just not part of my calling), so I am forever disualified from ever holding the post. Plus I have Grail Quest Books.
But if I ever did get the job here is what my fellow Star Wars readers in the fan community could expect...
I am engaged in an online Bible study focusing onC.S. Lewis', The Lion, The Witch and The Wardrobe. These posts are more or less the posts I made on the study's blog and I am happy to share them with the Realmscapes audience for discussion here.
C.S. Lewis is one of my favorite writers and Christian apologists. I am happy to be his student through his work because he put the Christian faith on a stage in a way that it could be engaged by all. He didn't write his Christian work (fiction or non-fiction) to convert, merely to meet his reader wherever they were and present an environment or argument for them to apply and/or enjoy at their leisure.
This is the mark of a "good" writer and there isn't enough "good" writing on today's bookshelves. It is fine to have an agenda as a writer, but that doesn't excuse the writer from being civil or approachable. And a writer should always be prepared to discuss their book's content in a conversational manner. This was C.S. Lewis. Those authors or readers who feel intimidated by a children's story about Christian truths are telling; it is ridiculous to believe Lewis intended to "brainwash" his audience. Part of a Christian's life is recognizing truth, and reflection.
And besides, the Christian faith is not a thing that can be chosen [Ephesians 2:8-10, Romans 10:17]. As Lewis so aptly confessed about his faith in Christ: one day you simply find yourself surprised by Joy, and that is how you know you have engaged something completely unique in the world. From there, you just can't help telling people about it, especially if you love to tell stories.
The recent disagreement over pricing that landed Macmillan books into the vacuum is indicative of the trials that have long plagued the publishing industry (especially the relationship between authour and publisher); it is a harbinger of coming changes that the realm of the internet, digital information, and mobile devices are bringing to the print industry--be it books, film, comics...whatever.
Creators, or writers in this most recent case, are going to be the casualties in this change since down-sizing companies are less likely to cut staff and more likely to cut authours that don't sell a higher threshold of books. A best-selling authour recently observed:
The simple fact is that none of us, no writer, is entitled to a career. We are all a single sales disaster away from working with the phrase, “Would you like fries with that?” Whether it is the downturn in the economy, your editor leaving your publisher, your publisher cutting the division that publishes your books, a retailer (for whatever reason) deciding not to carry your book, no writer should ever have the expectation of a career.
We have never been in control of our own fate.
Until now.
...
Are digital sales to the point where they can supplant traditional publishing income? For some authors they are. Digital readers are proliferating, and the J. K. Rowling demographic is very comfortable with reading off a screen. They’re reading more. And if your work is not available digitally, you don’t exist to them.
It’s time for writers to stop lamenting how the inefficiencies of the old system treat them badly, and to embrace the future. If writers don’t take control of their future, they doom themselves to the obscurity that will swallow the current business model whole.
This scribe's words ring true for many people right now, not just writers. When an economy or a corporate system fails, it is the employee or the contractor that ultimately takes the hit. This cycle will continue so long as people continue to rely on bosses and co-workers for their financial well-being.
So what happens when the axe finally falls? If you're a writer chances are you want to keep writing. (I'm a writer and I know I wouldn't want to abandon my calling just because someone's else's system failed me.) If you're a corporate or retail worker...then what? Unemployment is between 9% and 10%, with some states even worse.
Ultimately everyone turns to the internet to search for an opportunity. And why not? It's the world at our fingertips. And chances are very good that there are others just like us who are tired of playing the game of relying on other people and governments tinkering with economies. For us writers we have stories to tell and we want to make a living off of that if possible. That means finding our niche audience and connecting with them.
So what's the answer?
The answer is in marketing one's self. The answer is finding something that you love to do or create and building a customer base. The answer is setting your own value. Leverage yourself so that the only person you need to rely on when it comes to your financial well-being is you and those others that you decide share your exact same passion for success.
Kas and I have joined an internet marketing team that is building on the knowledge we already had, and helping us to harness the power of the internet even more so that we will never again have to worry about tying our finances to anyone other than our own abilities. Even if you don't have the knowledge of internet marketing, you are still welcome to consider joining our team where you can learn that knowledge and empower yourself to write your own paycheck from the comfort of your home doing whatever it is that you love to do, be it writing books, editing them, selling them...or something completely different.
"The most telling aspect of His Dark Materials ... is that the Reformation never happened in the world of The Golden Compass. Indeed, Pullman's simplistically harsh view of the church and God posit a power-hungry, misanthropic institution out of control, and a detached, domineering God devoid of grace."
The above assessment by historian, Dr Quinn Fox, is also the feeling I have from the book (and film). It definitely is a darker and deeply cynical work; it is certainly an antithesis to Lewis's Narnia. Why would we want to expose children to such an atmosphere? Even more puzzling, how can an authour simply brush away world history in his fantasy tale? Given what the Magestarium represents, his book would have been more fitting for the 15th century than the 20th or 21st.
Liberalism and its secular religions of atheism, agnosticm, and humanism seem largely made up of people who are paranoid of everything--most especially a "highr power". God encourages us to question, but liberals go beyond this to poke and doubt everything and everyone to the point of madness. HIS DARK MATERIALS is simply one on-ramp to that highway of darkness and the ironic thing is that paranoia usually leads to an obsession to control, and that can lead to the very authoritarian tyranny that Pullman's books encourage us to fight.
As an authour I have to think that Pullman missed the boat. His trilogy of books could have gone to a vastly more rewarding and upbeat conclusion. What if the characters got to the end and found that the Magestarium was indeed evil, not because it derived its power from its Authority (aka God), but because it decided to take power from the Authority? What if the ultimate quest of the books had been to free the Authority so that all could benefit from the goodness and light that the Magestarium wanted no part of?
I generally do not support activism when it comes to literature. I admonished parts of the Christian community for their extremist stand on the Harry Potter series, and I urged clear-thinking when it came to Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code. I am a firm believer that if you raise a child strongly rooted in the Christian faith, then they will be able to read books like Harry Potter and discern the many positive elements from those elements that are better left to the fictional world (using magic and all that). But the controversy surrounding Pullman's HIS DARK MATERIALS trilogy is very different.
In light of this Captain America death, I am trying to understand exactly what is going on here. The writers of the story-arc admit that there is political allegory as it relates to The Patriot Act.
Therein lies the problem: The Patriot Act was written to protect Americans against terrorist attacks, specifically another 9/11. It does not read the e-mail or tap the phones of EVERY American as the Democrats and media leads law-abiding Americans to believe.
Now in the comic book, The Superhero Registration Act is meant to register all superheroes in an attempt to control the mayhem that is caused when heroes and villains lock up. So if the comic is a commentary on The Patriot Act then the writers are giving a very false representation of what The Patriot Act is.
The libs in this country contend fiercely that The Patriot Act is a violation of civil liberties... which it is not. The Superhero Act is also considered a violation of civil liberties... which it is.
The Superhero Act is something out of communism or Nazism: implemented in order to track certain races, cultures, and political/religious beliefs; it is dangerous in that it sets the precedent for the government to require registration of anyone with a difference. That would mean that the comic is an commentary against communism/socialism/fascism--which is GOOD. But Marvel is releasing this thing at a time where the media is labeling The Patriot Act as a violation of civil liberities and the Bush Administration as Nazis. Meaning many of Marvel's readers are thinking right away of The Patriot Act and not of political theory.
The Patriot Act and The Superhero Registration Act are NOT the same thing. The story only confuses and blurs the lines of the debate. If this was intentional (and it sounds like it is) then allowing readers to discuss the comic in light of The Patriot Act is cowardly and irresponsible of Marvel.
P.S. And I still think Marvel killed Cap becasuse he is too conservative a character for the otherwise mostly liberal entertainment industry.
Recent Comments